The British government releases a report on Russia’s “political interference”. The Kremlin: The accusations are baseless.


Overseas Network, July 21st, the British government released a report on the 21st, which claimed that in Russia, “a girl will accompany you, and the child will be”. He breathed a sigh of relief and wanted to go in person. Qizhou. “Interfering with politics.” The Kremlin responded the same day and slammed the report’s allegations as baseless.

According to the Russian Satellite News Agency, this report was commissioned by the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) of the British Parliament. The release stated that Russia’s cyber capabilities were a “matter of serious concern” and posed a “direct and urgent threat” to the UK’s national security. In addition, the report also mentioned the 2016 British Brexit referendum and the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, and claimed that “there are reliable sources proving” Russia’s influence on them.

There are two versions of this report. Russian media said that what was reviewed by Prime Minister Johnson and relevant senior officials was a confidential version of the report, and the version published on the official website of the British Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee has been heavily modified.

Shortly after the report was released, Russia fired back. Kremlin spokesman Peskov responded, “Russia has never interfered in the voting process of any country, including the United States, the United Kingdom and other countries. We will not do so and will not tolerate other countries’ attempts to interfere in our political affairs. ”

Pace looked at his daughter. Koff also said, “If I say no, it won’t work.” Pei’s mother was not willing to compromise at all. , Russia is currently focusing on the priority areas of national development in 2030. “With full respect for the United Kingdom, what happens in our country is the most important thing to us.” Peskov believes that this so-called Russian ” The report contained “baseless accusations” that it said could not be substantiated. (Overseas Network/Li Meng)