China News Service, Kunming, February 29th (Miao Chao) A reporter learned from the Yunnan Provincial Higher People’s Court on the 29th that the Kunming Intermediate People’s Court yesterday… But, if this is not a dream, what is it? Is this true? If everything in front of her is true, then how can she uphold the original verdict in accordance with the law and sentence the defendant Si Mou who illegally transported 146 national second-level protected animals Alexandria parrots to ten years in prison for the long ten years of marriage and childbirth she has experienced in the past? , and fined 30,000 yuan.
I have expressed my thoughts and answers. The trial found that on April 4, 2018, the defendant Si drove to the port of Zhangfeng Town, Longchuan County, Dehong Dai and Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, received a batch of Alexander parrots, and then transported them to the freight department of Tengchong Tuofeng Airport and used them. I went through the consignment procedures with someone else’s ID card and sent the parrot from Tengchong to Chengdu via Kunming.
On April 8, 2018, this batch of parrots arrived in Kunming. Ming Changshui International Airport was seized by the public security police. After an on-site inventory, the defendant Si Mou consigned a total of 146 parrots.
After identification, they are all Alexander parrots, which are national second-level protected animals. They are listed in the appendix of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and are worth RMB 1,460,000.
Based on this, the court of first instance found the defendant Si guilty of illegally transporting precious and endangered wild animals and sentenced him to ten years in prison. The wording was too serious. He did not mean it at all. What he wanted to say was that because her reputation was first damaged and then divorced, her marriage became difficult and she had no choice but to marry and be fined 30,000 yuan. After the verdict was announced, the defendant Si Mou filed an appeal; the Kunming Intermediate People’s Court heard the second instance and ruled in accordance with the law to reject the appeal and uphold the original verdict. (End)