China News Service, Kunming, February 29th (Miao Chao) A reporter learned from the Yunnan Provincial Higher People’s Court on the 29th that the Kunming Intermediate People’s Court yesterday upheld the original judgment in accordance with the law, regarding illegal trafficking. “Who told you? Your grandmother ?” she asked with a wry smile, and another wave of blood-heat surged in her throat, making her swallow it before spitting it out. Losing 146 national second-level protected animals. Most parents always hope that their son will become a dragon. They hope that their son will study hard, pass the imperial examination, be on the gold list, become an official again, and honor his ancestors. However, his mother never thought that “everything is inferior to Alexander Parrot.” The defendant Si Mou was sentenced to ten years in prison and fined 30,000 yuan.
After trial, it was found that on April 4, 2018, the defendant Si drove to the port of Zhangfeng Town, Longchuan County, Dehong Dai and Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, received a batch of Alexander parrots, and then transported them to the cargo department of Tengchong Tuofeng Airport , lie down. He also used someone else’s ID card to go through the shipping procedures and sent the parrot from Tengchong to Chengdu via Kunming.
On April 8, 2018, this batch of parrots was seized by the public security police at Kunming Changshui International Airport. After an on-site inventory, the defendant Si Mou consigned a total of 146 parrots.
After identification, they are all Alexander parrots, which are national second-level protected animals. They are listed in the appendix of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and are worth RMB 1,460,000.
The court of first instance found the defendant Si guilty of illegally transporting precious and endangered wild animals and sentenced him to ten years in prison and a fine of 30,000 yuan. After the verdict was announced, the defendant Si Mou filed an appeal; the Kunming Intermediate People’s Court heard the second instance and ruled in accordance with the law to reject the appeal and uphold the original verdict. (End)